 |
| Adrian Mastracci |
By Gigi Suhanic
National Post
FP Money
Saturday, October 12, 2002
Question:
A son-in-law, who owns and resides in his own matrimonial
home, purchases a second home for his parents-in-law
to live in. The son-in-law finances the purchase via
a conventional bank mortgage.
The parents-in-law have offered to reduce the financial
burden (bank mortgage interest expense) and have proposed
that their son-in-law discharge the bank mortgage and
replace it with a mortgage loan from them at no interest.
Will the parents-in-law have any interest income attributed
to them? If yes, is there any other way to effect the
above without income being attributed to the parents-in-law?
A gift of the mortgage principal amount to the son-in-law
is not a possibility, from the parents-in-law's perspective.
Adrian Mastracci, fee-only
investment counsel at Vancouver based KCM Wealth Management,
says, “The bigger question is how to structure
the purchase so that it produces the best results for
the two families.”
Answer:
In general, attribution of income applies if you lend
or transfer property to a related person, including
a spouse, or any person under age 18. These rules are
intended to discourage income splitting, says Adrian
Mastracci of KCM Wealth Management
in Vancouver.
However, the second property purchased by the son-in-law
will be an investment property for him. It will be subject
to the tax consequences of capital gains or losses upon
its sale. The bigger question is how to structure the
purchase so that it produces the best results for the
two families.
It appears that the parents-in-law do not own a principal
residence now, or will be vacating one. Ideally, it
would be preferable to arrange the purchase so that
the parents-in-law could also use the principal residence
exemption. Of course, all of the requirements must be
satisfied for purposes of claiming the principal residence
exemption.
Given that the parents-in-law want to live in the property
and pay off the mortgage with their cash, a better scenario
may be for them to purchase the property in the first
place. This allows them to partake in the principal
residence exemption when the property is sold.
I do not know their whole picture. Hence, there may
be additional financial considerations for the parents-in-law
if they do not have the full purchase price in cash.
If the son-in-law has already purchased the property,
he should be aware that there may be some penalties
in the discharge of the bank mortgage. Unless the mortgage
is fully open, there will likely be at least a three-month
interest penalty. Further, the mortgage may only allow
a fixed amount of repayment without penalty, such as
10% to 20% per year.
As is often the case, one has to look beyond the obvious
in order to take full advantage of the tax provisions.
|