For Kids Philosophy Press Gallery Newsletters Services Starting Out About Us Contact
FEATURED TOPICS
What is Wealth Management?
Investing 2007
Retirement 2007
Estate Planning 2007
Our Portfolio Makeovers
QUICK LINKS
KCM Brochure
Latest KCM Newsletter
Latest Media Article
Request Contact From Us
Request Our Newsletter
POPULAR ARTICLES
Sizing Up Retirement
Wise Investors Diversify
Portfolio Design
Investment Fees
10 Favourite Baskets
PRESS GALLERY
Articles featuring Adrian Mastracci of KCM Wealth Management
National Post PRESS GALLERY MAIN
COMMENT ON ARTICLE
Two families can win
from purchase of house

You ask, we answer

Adrian Mastracci

By Gigi Suhanic
National Post
FP Money
Saturday, October 12, 2002

Question: A son-in-law, who owns and resides in his own matrimonial home, purchases a second home for his parents-in-law to live in. The son-in-law finances the purchase via a conventional bank mortgage.

The parents-in-law have offered to reduce the financial burden (bank mortgage interest expense) and have proposed that their son-in-law discharge the bank mortgage and replace it with a mortgage loan from them at no interest.

Will the parents-in-law have any interest income attributed to them? If yes, is there any other way to effect the above without income being attributed to the parents-in-law? A gift of the mortgage principal amount to the son-in-law is not a possibility, from the parents-in-law's perspective.


Adrian Mastracci, fee-only investment counsel at Vancouver based KCM Wealth Management, says, “The bigger question is how to structure the purchase so that it produces the best results for the two families.”

Answer: In general, attribution of income applies if you lend or transfer property to a related person, including a spouse, or any person under age 18. These rules are intended to discourage income splitting, says Adrian Mastracci of KCM Wealth Management in Vancouver.

However, the second property purchased by the son-in-law will be an investment property for him. It will be subject to the tax consequences of capital gains or losses upon its sale. The bigger question is how to structure the purchase so that it produces the best results for the two families.

It appears that the parents-in-law do not own a principal residence now, or will be vacating one. Ideally, it would be preferable to arrange the purchase so that the parents-in-law could also use the principal residence exemption. Of course, all of the requirements must be satisfied for purposes of claiming the principal residence exemption.

Given that the parents-in-law want to live in the property and pay off the mortgage with their cash, a better scenario may be for them to purchase the property in the first place. This allows them to partake in the principal residence exemption when the property is sold.

I do not know their whole picture. Hence, there may be additional financial considerations for the parents-in-law if they do not have the full purchase price in cash.

If the son-in-law has already purchased the property, he should be aware that there may be some penalties in the discharge of the bank mortgage. Unless the mortgage is fully open, there will likely be at least a three-month interest penalty. Further, the mortgage may only allow a fixed amount of repayment without penalty, such as 10% to 20% per year.

As is often the case, one has to look beyond the obvious in order to take full advantage of the tax provisions.


RETURN TO TOP  |  RETURN TO PRESS GALLERY INDEX
Email to kcm@kcmwealth.com, send a voice mail to (604) 739-4500, or mail to:

KCM Wealth Management Inc.
1500 - 885 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, B.C. V6C 3E8
Our counsel is objective, without conflicts of interests.
MEDIA EVENTS
Vancouver Sun Makeover
Business News Network

Adrian Mastracci
is a guest on
Trading Day
with Michael Hainsworth

Tuesday,
January 22, 2007
at 11:05 am PST
ON THE WEB